On Wed, Sep 26, 2001 at 12:36:29PM -0500, Steve Greenland wrote: > How is that sane? I'm parsing that as "(foo OR bar OR baz) AND foo", > which is the same as "(bar OR baz) AND foo", right? Err, "(foo OR bar OR baz) AND foo" != "(bar or baz) AND foo", because it can also be "foo AND foo" (= "foo"). Hamish -- Hamish Moffatt VK3SB <hamish@debian.org> <hamish@cloud.net.au>