On 01-09-24 Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Sep 24, Christian Kurz <shorty@debian.org> wrote:
>
> >So you want to force everyone who is interested in running this chroot
> >to use a kernel 2.4.x at least? That's in my opinion a not acceptable
> Yes, since managing a chroot environment without bind mounts is way
It maybe harder, but that's not a good reason to force system
administrator to run a kernel 2.4.x for having the bind debian package
chrooted. The reason which kernel version is used on a server should
always belong to the admin and should never be imposed by some software.
> harder and IMO cannot easily/correctly be done by a package.
Why not? What do you think makes that part so difficult?
Christian
--
Debian Developer (http://www.debian.org)
1024/26CC7853 31E6 A8CA 68FC 284F 7D16 63EC A9E6 67FF 26CC 7853
Attachment:
pgps3LadYYnYa.pgp
Description: PGP signature