[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: libgal sonames

On Sat, Sep 01, 2001 at 05:30:52PM +0200, Rodrigo Moya wrote:
> On Sat, 2001-09-01 at 16:35, Mark Brown wrote:

> > Well, yes but that goal could be accomplished by statically linking the
> > library.  Though if upstream think it makes sense to have it shared
> > you're kind of stuck with a lot of the problems.

> but, that's what sonames and library versioning are for, are they not?

Yes, but the ABI is so unstable that this would entail keeping around
fairly large numbers of old libraries.

> I mean, the problem is on libgal9 being removed when installing
> libgal10. If both can coexist, there's no problem at all, right?

It'll work but it's not nice and seems to miss some of the point of
having the library be shared.

"You grabbed my hand and we fell into it, like a daydream - or a fever."

Attachment: pgpv9kVcicUMT.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: