[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: "Section" in *.doc-base file.



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Wednesday 15 August 2001 07:26 am, Branden Robinson wrote:
> Does your training in poststructuralism render the following
> incomprehensible to you?
>
>   Mail-Copies-To: nobody
>   X-No-CC: I subscribe to this list; do not CC me on replies.
>
> These headers are present in all messages I send to Debian lists.  The
> former is for MUA's that respect basic conventions; the latter is for
> people who do.  Apparently, you can be bothered to neither do so
> yourself nor use tools that do so.
>

LOL. I don't have a training in poststructuralism. :)) As a matter of fact, 
this may well be the first time I have ever used the word. I have little 
respect for postmodernism in general, though.

<snip>

FYI, I'm using KMail and I did not see your mail headers. I must admit that 
KMail does not yet obey conventions perfectly. It seems that I have hit 
"Reply All" button. 

As you see I'm sending this mail only to debian-devel as you request.

>
> Instead, you seem to be continuing a campaign of personal harassment via
> email flooding, which hardly seems to give you the higher ground you
> seek.

I am not seeking a higher ground. I am not harrassing anybody by email 
flooding either. What is more, I don't think my Cc: use deserves two replies.

Thanks for pointing out your headers. I'll see if there's a problem with 
KMail.

Regards,

- -- 
Eray Ozkural (exa) <erayo@cs.bilkent.edu.tr>
Comp. Sci. Dept., Bilkent University, Ankara
www: http://www.cs.bilkent.edu.tr/~erayo
GPG public key fingerprint: 360C 852F 88B0 A745 F31B  EA0F 7C07 AE16 874D 539C
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE7elTNfAeuFodNU5wRAsQTAKCC5eDc9X23yeJexvL2RNoR9tTD1wCeKFgc
pu74jectvOlj130oK5xGEOc=
=BL+j
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Reply to: