On Wed, Jul 25, 2001 at 05:08:31PM -0300, Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote: > > Both the -br and the -en packages? > > > > Might would a meta-package depend on both? Why would anyone wany > > both versions? Seems to me people will want one or the other? > yeah, Matt Zimmerman pointed this out... I'll make it depend on > one or other... (apt-howto-pt | apt-howto-en) Why the hell do you need a metapackage at all? doc-linux-* don't need a metapackage and I'm pretty sure I could install any and every language I feel would be useful. How is this different? Overcomplicating things isn't necessary and would just add to the size of Packages.gz, which is massive already and growing every day. -- Joseph Carter <knghtbrd@d2dc.net> Free software developer * cesarb wonders if in less than a week Carmack will end up receiving in e-mail a courtesy copy of a version of the Quake source which is four times faster than what went out of his virtual hands...
Attachment:
pgpcTg5MhD3FG.pgp
Description: PGP signature