Re: Why is there no libopenldap1-dev in sid ?
Previously Gregor Hoffleit wrote:
> Hi Ben,
Actually I maintain the LDAP packages now. I don't have time to
also maintain OpenLDAP1 packages but I have no objection to anyone
volunteering to make a minimal packages of them with only libopenldap1
and libopenldap1-dev.
> The developers are working on a port to the v.2 API, but don't want to hurry
> that, since there have been so fundamental changes (cf. the discussion in
> the python-ldap list on
> http://www.geocrawler.com/lists/3/SourceForge/1568/0/)
Judging by that discussion the current CVS code plus some known
patches work, but nobody is really maintaining python-ldap anymore
currently.
> Now should I remove the python-ldap package from sid, or is there a chance
> that we could include a legacy libopenldap1-dev package ?
Only if someone volunteers to build suck a package I'm afraid.
Wichert.
--
_________________________________________________________________
/ Nothing is fool-proof to a sufficiently talented fool \
| wichert@wiggy.net http://www.liacs.nl/~wichert/ |
| 1024D/2FA3BC2D 576E 100B 518D 2F16 36B0 2805 3CB8 9250 2FA3 BC2D |
Reply to: