Re: QPL in /usr/share/comon-licences (was: Re: wnpp: ITP: apc --
On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 10:52:53AM +0200, Luca De_Vitis wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 09:35:31AM +0200, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> > Previously John Galt wrote:
> > > Wasn't that the bone of contention? Whether or not the present tack of
> > > symlinking /usr/share/doc/common-license was allowable? I was
> > > hypothesizing that this was not the case.
> >
> > Yes, but Ben came up with the trick if putting the full GPL in the
> > package, and replacing that file with a symlink in the postinst.
>
> I agree (i was thinking the same thing while reading the thread).
> And what about changing /usr/share/doc/common-license in
> /usr/share/doc/supported-license?
BTW, note that it's /usr/share/common-licenses, not
/usr/share/doc/common-licenses. Why is this so? It's a mistake, IMHO.
Hamish
--
Hamish Moffatt VK3SB <hamish@debian.org> <hamish@cloud.net.au>
Reply to: