Re: QPL in /usr/share/comon-licences (was: Re: wnpp: ITP: apc --
On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 09:35:31AM +0200, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> Previously John Galt wrote:
> > Wasn't that the bone of contention? Whether or not the present tack of
> > symlinking /usr/share/doc/common-license was allowable? I was
> > hypothesizing that this was not the case.
>
> Yes, but Ben came up with the trick if putting the full GPL in the
> package, and replacing that file with a symlink in the postinst.
I agree (i was thinking the same thing while reading the thread).
And what about changing /usr/share/doc/common-license in
/usr/share/doc/supported-license?
--
Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis
aliases: Luca ^De [A-Z][A-Za-z\-]*[iy]'\?s$
ICQ: 66094859 IRC: wh1sk3y (irc.openprojects.net)
Reply to: