Re: QPL in /usr/share/comon-licences (was: Re: wnpp: ITP: apc --
Previously John Galt wrote:
> No. However if it's resolved so that the GPL must be included in each
> deb, there's really no more point in common-licenses, thus neatly solving
> the whole issue at hand.
That's not true, you could replace the GPL document in the package
with a symlink to a copy in common-licenses in the postinst for
example.
Wichert.
--
_________________________________________________________________
/ Nothing is fool-proof to a sufficiently talented fool \
| wichert@wiggy.net http://www.liacs.nl/~wichert/ |
| 1024D/2FA3BC2D 576E 100B 518D 2F16 36B0 2805 3CB8 9250 2FA3 BC2D |
Reply to: