[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: QPL in /usr/share/comon-licences (was: Re: wnpp: ITP: apc --

Previously John Galt wrote:
> No.  However if it's resolved so that the GPL must be included in each
> deb, there's really no more point in common-licenses, thus neatly solving
> the whole issue at hand.

That's not true, you could replace the GPL document in the package
with a symlink to a copy in common-licenses in the postinst for


 /       Nothing is fool-proof to a sufficiently talented fool     \
| wichert@wiggy.net                   http://www.liacs.nl/~wichert/ |
| 1024D/2FA3BC2D 576E 100B 518D 2F16 36B0  2805 3CB8 9250 2FA3 BC2D |

Reply to: