Re: Autoconf 2.50
Ben Pfaff <firstname.lastname@example.org> immo vero scripsit
> So far, it sounds like most of the bugs are either in packages or
> shared between autoconf and packages. I'll hold off for at least
> a few days, then, on deciding whether to revert.
I have a strong feeling that mpich's configure won't work with 2.50.
It would be nice to have a "backward-compatible" version of autoconf.
Otherwise, we probably are introducing a bunch of
"can't build from source" bugs by silently upgrading autoconf.
This is in my humble opinion, though.
It would be nicer if I could Build-Depends: autoconf-2.13
or have a autoconf-2.13 package to build the configure scripts.
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
GE d+ s:- a-- C+ UL++++ P- L+++ E W++ N o-- K- w++
O- M- V-- PS+ PE-- Y+ PGP+ t-- 5 X-- R* tv- b+ DI- D++
G e h* r% !y+
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------