Re: LILO
Frederico Muñoz (2001-05-10 15:18:12 +0100) :
> That's really a point I forgot and one of the uttermost
> importance. Until it is this way LILO is better because it runs
> better in several archs (read: runs at all).
,----[ From lilo-21.7.1/debian/control ]
| Package: lilo
| Section: base
| Priority: important
| Architecture: i386
`----
Am I missing something, or are you? ;-)
Roland.
--
Roland Mas
'ALL your base? No!! One tiny base continue bravely to resist.'
-- <wiggy> in #debian-devel
Reply to:
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: LILO
- From: Frederico Muñoz <fsmunoz@sdf.lonestar.org>
- References:
- LILO
- From: Russell Coker <russell@coker.com.au>
- Re: LILO
- From: Robert van der Meulen <rvdm@cistron.nl>
- Re: LILO
- From: Russell Coker <russell@coker.com.au>
- Re: LILO
- From: Roland Bauerschmidt <rb@debian.org>
- Re: LILO
- From: Itai Zukerman <zukerman@math-hat.com>
- Re: LILO
- From: Frederico Muñoz <fsmunoz@sdf.lonestar.org>
- Re: LILO
- From: Roland Mas <lolando@debian.org>
- Re: LILO
- From: Frederico Muñoz <fsmunoz@sdf.lonestar.org>