Re: SGI's xfs
On Thu, May 03, 2001 at 09:28:14AM +0200, Radovan Garabik wrote:
> On May 2, 11:22am, Ed Boraas wrote:
> > Subject: Re: SGI's xfs
> > > Previously Matthias Berse wrote:
> > > > Are there any plans in supporting the usage of SGI's xfs filesystem in
> > > > debian? Are there kernel patches available and/or userspace tools
> > > > being packaged?
> > >
> > > The userspace tools have been in unstable for a while already actually.
> >
> > And the kernel patches are in incoming.
> >
>
> and how do you solve the requirement to use gcc version 2.91.66
> for compiling?
the gcc 2.95 in unstable works great. it's gcc 2.96 that's the real problematic
compiler. (of course)
--
-> -/- - Rahul Jain - -\- <-
-> -\- http://linux.rice.edu/~rahul -=- mailto:rahul-jain@usa.net -/- <-
-> -/- "I never could get the hang of Thursdays." - HHGTTG by DNA -\- <-
|--|--------|--------------|----|-------------|------|---------|-----|-|
Version 11.423.999.220020101.23.50110101.042
(c)1996-2000, All rights reserved. Disclaimer available upon request.
Reply to:
- References:
- SGI's xfs
- From: Matthias Berse <matthias.berse@ruhr-uni-bochum.de>
- Re: SGI's xfs
- From: Wichert Akkerman <wichert@valinux.com>
- Re: SGI's xfs
- From: "Ed Boraas" <ed@boraas.ca>
- Re: SGI's xfs
- From: "Nathan Scott" <nathans@wobbly.melbourne.sgi.com>
- Re: SGI's xfs
- From: Radovan Garabik <garabik@melkor.dnp.fmph.uniba.sk>