Re: kernel-{image,headers} package bloat
Dave Benson <daveb@ffem.org> writes:
> i'm an idiot. i wasted bandwidth and answered my own question.
Don't worry about it.
Just in case anyone else was confused, I'm still in favor of having at
least *one* precompiled kernel per-architecture, so no one *has* to
compile a kernel, but if they want a customized kernel, then,
presuming the idea has merit, they would need to install the
kernel-custom package, make a selection, and wait a bit.
--
Rob Browning <rlb@cs.utexas.edu> PGP=E80E0D04F521A094 532B97F5D64E3930
Reply to:
- References:
- Re: kernel-{image,headers} package bloat
- From: Andreas Metzler <ametzler@downhill.at.eu.org>
- Re: kernel-{image,headers} package bloat
- From: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
- Re: kernel-{image,headers} package bloat
- From: Craig Sanders <cas@taz.net.au>
- Re: kernel-{image,headers} package bloat
- From: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
- Re: kernel-{image,headers} package bloat
- From: Craig Sanders <cas@taz.net.au>
- Re: kernel-{image,headers} package bloat
- From: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
- Re: kernel-{image,headers} package bloat
- From: David Schleef <ds@schleef.org>
- Re: kernel-{image,headers} package bloat
- From: Rob Browning <rlb@cs.utexas.edu>
- Re: kernel-{image,headers} package bloat
- From: Dave Benson <daveb@ffem.org>
- Re: kernel-{image,headers} package bloat
- From: Dave Benson <daveb@ffem.org>