On Thu, Apr 12, 2001 at 12:35:07AM -0700, David Schleef wrote: > On Thu, Apr 12, 2001 at 04:47:01PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > > > > Which architectures out-of-dateness is ignored is based on how their > > respective buildds are going. I'm intending to use <85% as a reason to > > start ignoring architecures, and >90% as a reason to make the checks > > start counting again. At the moment arm, m68k and powerpc are ignored. > > > > The current wanna-build statistics for the architectures in testing > > are: > > > > ppc: (unknown) > > Does this indicate we need another powerpc buildd? I have a > machine that can be used for this; I just keep missing > pointers to setting up a buildd when discussions go around. the powerpc buildd is a dual G4 greater then 400Mhz. i don't think another powerpc buildd will make much difference. fixing broken packages on the other hand will. -- Ethan Benson http://www.alaska.net/~erbenson/
Attachment:
pgpKofWWcgBPt.pgp
Description: PGP signature