Re: Why isn't gcc-2.91.66 (egcs-1.1.2) packaged (for kernel 2.4 builds)

[Adrian Bunk <bunk@fs.tum.de>]

On Wed, 14 Mar 2001, Neil L. Roeth wrote:

> I, too, would like to see egcs 1.1.2 (2.91.66) in potato.  I recently
> had to compile a program that would compile with that, but not with
> 2.95.2, and when I tried to install the slink package it told me it
>...

Is the problem why the problem doesn't compile a bug in gcc or a bug in
the program?

cu
Adrian

-- 

Nicht weil die Dinge schwierig sind wagen wir sie nicht,
sondern weil wir sie nicht wagen sind sie schwierig.