Re: Why isn't gcc-2.91.66 (egcs-1.1.2) packaged (for kernel 2.4 builds)
On Thu, 15 Mar 2001, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Mar 2001, Neil L. Roeth wrote:
> > I, too, would like to see egcs 1.1.2 (2.91.66) in potato. I recently
> > had to compile a program that would compile with that, but not with
> > 2.95.2, and when I tried to install the slink package it told me it
> Is the problem why the problem doesn't compile a bug in gcc or a bug in
> the program?
According to Murphy, it's usualy both :)
Murphy was an optimist.