Re: portability as a goal for debian?

To: Debian Development <debian-devel@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: portability as a goal for debian?
From: Andreas Schuldei <andreas@schuldei.org>
Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2001 14:36:22 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 20010307143622.A18703@sigrid.schuldei.com>
Mail-followup-to: Debian Development <debian-devel@lists.debian.org>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20010307142242.C31009@kosh.informatik.hu-berlin.de>; from piefel@informatik.hu-berlin.de on Wed, Mar 07, 2001 at 02:22:42PM +0100
References: <[🔎] 20010306142613.A23974@molehole.moregruel.net> <[🔎] Pine.LNX.4.21.0103061717570.17697-100000@spawn.hockeyfiend.com> <[🔎] 20010307104023.D18218@sigrid.schuldei.com> <[🔎] 20010307142242.C31009@kosh.informatik.hu-berlin.de>

* Michael Piefel (piefel@informatik.hu-berlin.de) [010307 14:29]:
> I feel that calling the whole thing Debian GNU/Linux is quite explicit
> already. What more do you ask for?

Obviously we also have debian gnu/hurd. Now imagine
debian gnu/openbsd or debian openbsd. the name debian gnu/linux
allready implies that gnu and linux are only one of several
different options.

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: portability as a goal for debian?
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz <dan@debian.org>
- Re: portability as a goal for debian?
  - From: "Jürgen A. Erhard" <juergen.erhard@gmx.net>

References:
- Re: portability as a goal for debian?
  - From: Steve Greenland <stevegr@debian.org>
- Re: portability as a goal for debian?
  - From: "Christopher C. Chimelis" <chris@debian.org>
- Re: portability as a goal for debian?
  - From: Andreas Schuldei <andreas@schuldei.org>
- Re: portability as a goal for debian?
  - From: Michael Piefel <piefel@informatik.hu-berlin.de>

Prev by Date: Re: Bug#88588: libpam-modules: pam-limits.so is broken
Next by Date: Re: portability as a goal for debian?
Previous by thread: Re: portability as a goal for debian?
Next by thread: Re: portability as a goal for debian?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread