Re: Why whichman is in testing?
Joey Hess wrote:
> Robert Luberda wrote:
> > Whichman is a new package (about 10 days in unstable),
> > it is `architecture: any', and as you can see above, it has no
> > m68k binares,
> > but it is in testing.
> I think that testing doesn't mind if a package has never been compiled
> on one arch. It's only when a package used to compile on an arch, but is
> not longer being updated for that arch that it will hold it out of
If this were the case, it would not be true that "testing is always in
a releseable state", unless we have abandoned our aim to release all
six architectures in sync.