Re: Developer Behavior

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Developer Behavior
From: Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho <gaia@iki.fi>
Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2001 19:40:52 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 20010108194052.F4120@gaia.iki.fi>
Mail-followup-to: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20010108084511.E23712@vitelus.com>; from aaronl@vitelus.com on Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 08:45:11AM -0800
References: <[🔎] OF16B3E26F.34064CAC-ON862569CE.005A9C78@norlight.com> <[🔎] 20010108084511.E23712@vitelus.com>

On 20010108T084511-0800, Aaron Lehmann wrote:
> The DAM is quite busy, and I sympathize with him. However, once
> allowed to I would voulenteer to aid him with his duties to expedite
> the processes.

I doubt that a fresh developer would be allowed to take on such a
vulnerable position as the DAM.  You'd have to be quite extraordinary
to achieve that.

-- 
%%% Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho % gaia@iki.fi % http://www.iki.fi/gaia/ %%%

                     Keep the Deja Archive Alive!
        http://www2.PetitionOnline.com/dejanews/petition.html

Reply to:

References:
- Re: Developer Behavior
  - From: "Vince Mulhollon" <vlm@norlight.com>
- Re: Developer Behavior
  - From: Aaron Lehmann <aaronl@vitelus.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Compiling 2.0.38 kernel
Next by Date: Re: Developer Behavior
Previous by thread: Re: Developer Behavior
Next by thread: Re: Developer Behavior [new maintainer waiting period]
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread