[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: dpkg-buldpackage thinks radiusd-cistron is debian-native

On Sat, Nov 25, 2000 at 09:35:39AM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Sat, 25 Nov 2000, Norbert Veber wrote:
> > It doesnt look like thats it in this case:
> > nveber@pyre[~/debian/radiusd/radiusd-cistron-1.6.3/debian]$ cat changelog
> > radiusd-cistron (1.6.3-1) local; urgency=low
> >...
> Is there a ../radiusd-cistron_1.6.3.orig.tar.gz? If not that's the reason
> why dpkg-buildpackage think's it's a native package.

Hmm, but why would there be a ../radiusd-cistron_1.6.3.orig.tar.gz if this
is the first time this version of the source is being debianized?  (ie,
there is a radiusd-cistron 1.6.1 deb, but not 1.6.3..)  Shouldnt
I have a ../radiusd-cistron-1.6.3.tar.gz instead?

> > Last time I tried it (about two weeks ago) it didnt produce a diff, though I
> > cant double check at the moment, as it wont compile due to missing files in
> > libc6-dev:
> > /usr/include/bits/socket.h:300: asm/socket.h: No such file or directory
> This problem is fixed in libc6-dev version 2.2-4 that is in unstable since
> at about 12 hours.

Cool, thanks.

Attachment: pgpPQu1eP85DI.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: