Re: Funny situation with Licq.
On Sat, Nov 25, 2000 at 11:18:53AM -0600, Kirk Strauser wrote:
> Is it Zed's job to fix that bug, or is he responsible for making sure that
> the package has the latest fixes from upstream?
It's his job to get that bug fixed (or at least try to), as he is the
maintainer of the package -- whichever way he (tries to get it or) gets it
done is fine.
> If it's the latter, then should this have been a Debian bug in the first
> place, or should it have been reported directly to the Licq authors?
It doesn't matter, because the Debian maintainer is responsible for passing
on user bug reports to upstream maintainers when appropriate.
--
Digital Electronic Being Intended for Assassination and Nullification
Reply to: