[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: dpkg-buldpackage thinks radiusd-cistron is debian-native

On Sat, Nov 25, 2000 at 02:06:51AM -0600, Adam Heath wrote:
> On Sat, 25 Nov 2000, Norbert Veber wrote:
> > How does dpkg-buildpackage determine the source version?  I dont know why,
> > but it keeps thinking that my package is debian native, and doesnt produce a
> > package.orig.tar.gz or a diff, instead it just builds it as a debian native
> > package..
> > 
> > I looked though every file in the debian/ directory and couldnt find
> > anything relevant.
> > 
> > PS.  The original source tarball allready contains a debian/ directory, could 
> >      that be it?  If so, should I jsut delete it and make a new tar instead
> >      of using the upstream?
> It checks the version in debian/changelog.  If it doesn't contain a -, then it
> is a native package.

It doesnt look like thats it in this case:
nveber@pyre[~/debian/radiusd/radiusd-cistron-1.6.3/debian]$ cat changelog 
radiusd-cistron (1.6.3-1) local; urgency=low

  * New upstream version.
  * Fixed wrong symbolic link: /usr/doc/radiusd-cistron, Closes #56508,
    #57718, #65139, #67755.
  * port range in huntgroups bug fixed (1.6.3 upstream fix), Closes #60927
  * debian/dirs now lists "var/log/radacct" (directory not created by the
    Makefile), Closes #58177

 -- Norbert Veber <nveber@debian.org>  Tue, 14 Nov 2000 15:23:54 -0500

nveber@pyre[~/debian/radiusd/radiusd-cistron-1.6.3]$ dpkg-buildpackage
dpkg-buildpackage: source package is radiusd-cistron
dpkg-buildpackage: source version is 1.6.3-1
dpkg-buildpackage: source maintainer is Norbert Veber <nveber@debian.org>
dpkg-buildpackage: build architecture is i386

Last time I tried it (about two weeks ago) it didnt produce a diff, though I
cant double check at the moment, as it wont compile due to missing files in 
/usr/include/bits/socket.h:300: asm/socket.h: No such file or directory

Attachment: pgpTfPzqt9R60.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: