Re: 2.2r1 release problems
On Tue, Nov 14, 2000 at 06:59:40AM -0900, Ethan Benson wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 14, 2000 at 07:13:21AM -0800, email@example.com wrote:
> > OK, it's nice to get the warning, but it still amounts to there being no
> > stable version of Debian at the moment, which I think is a situation to be
> this is silly sensationalism, instead of posting over and over again
> how stable is totally broken and worthless how about stating some
> facts to back this up, i have upgraded 4 machines on two archetectures
> (i386 and powerpc) and everything has been working perfectly no
> problems or breakage whatsoever. maybe its just me but it sure looks
> like `no stable version of Debian' is a gross exaggeration.
> i would be interested to know exactly what Wichert means by `r1 is
> broken' if that is really what he said.
I heard mumblings of ``sparc'' and ``pcmcia-cs''.
But they are only rumours until confirmed (for you media types).