Re: Comments on FHS testsuite run
Previously Andrew Josey wrote:
> We should not be expecting any distributions to pass the current version
> of the test suite. Although we believe it to be a fair and accurate test of
> LSB FHS 2.1 specification, there are issues with the specification and tests
> that need to be resolved.
Indeed; I explicitly said so. I wish SuSE mentioned that in their press
release as well though. In fact I expect that the test results get worse
once work progresses.. certainly things like lsb scripts and
modifications to uname aren't done yet or tested for.
/ Generally uninteresting signature - ignore at your convenience \
| firstname.lastname@example.org http://www.liacs.nl/~wichert/ |
| 1024D/2FA3BC2D 576E 100B 518D 2F16 36B0 2805 3CB8 9250 2FA3 BC2D |