[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Comments on FHS testsuite run

Previously Andrew Josey wrote:
> We should not be expecting any distributions to pass the current version
> of the test suite.  Although we believe it to be a fair and accurate test of
> the
> LSB FHS 2.1 specification, there are issues with the specification and tests
> that need to be resolved.

Indeed; I explicitly said so. I wish SuSE mentioned that in their press
release as well though. In fact I expect that the test results get worse
once work progresses.. certainly things like lsb scripts and
modifications to uname aren't done yet or tested for.


 / Generally uninteresting signature - ignore at your convenience  \
| wichert@cistron.nl                  http://www.liacs.nl/~wichert/ |
| 1024D/2FA3BC2D 576E 100B 518D 2F16 36B0  2805 3CB8 9250 2FA3 BC2D |

Reply to: