Re: would be a wishlist bug against alien, but ...
- To: Chris Fearnley <cjf@LinuxForce.net>
- Cc: firstname.lastname@example.org, Fred Harju <email@example.com>, pads@list.LinuxForce.net
- Subject: Re: would be a wishlist bug against alien, but ...
- From: Joey Hess <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2000 11:20:57 -0700
- Message-id: <20001020112057.C19444@kitenet.net>
- Mail-followup-to: Joey Hess <email@example.com>, Chris Fearnley <cjf@LinuxForce.net>, firstname.lastname@example.org, Fred Harju <email@example.com>, pads@list.LinuxForce.net
- In-reply-to: <20001019005310.B15453@linux00.LinuxForce.net>; from cjf@LinuxForce.net on Thu, Oct 19, 2000 at 12:53:10AM -0400
- References: <20001019001502.A9594@linux00.LinuxForce.net> <20001018214003.B20923@kitenet.net> <20001019005310.B15453@linux00.LinuxForce.net>
Chris Fearnley wrote:
> Very good point, I hadn't considered that. But isn't it only a warning in
> dpkg? Or was that fixed?
I think it probably depends on if we're in unstable or not, and whether
dpkg --force-overwrite defaults to on. FWIW, alien -i calls dpkg
> And their dependency check is rendered obsolete by alien's calls to
> dpkg-shlibdeps and dh_perl. Correct?
I don't remember, I just don't remember that they struck me as a good
idea when I looked at the patch.
see shy jo