Re: Misclassification of packages; "libs" and "doc" sections
In 12 Oct 2000 16:12:11 -0400 James Antill <firstname.lastname@example.org> cum veritate scripsit :
> Exactly, so why suggest it.
> Other ideas...
> Put a cgi on www.debian.org to provide apt-cache via. a web page.
It's already there on packages.debian.org, I think.
And I can't see where this dicussion is pointing to.
The current only method of searching that I find useful is
apt-cache search, and about the only thing that I have as a wish is
to make it able to accept more than one keyword...
and I want more packages to include appropriate keywords in
their description lines for apt-cache search to work decently.
University: email@example.com Netfort: firstname.lastname@example.org
dancer, a.k.a. Junichi Uekawa http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
Dept. of Knowledge Engineering and Computer Science, Doshisha University.
... Long Live Free Software, LIBERTAS OMNI VINCIT.