[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Mozilla update in Potato Proposed updates?

On 20000905T215159-0700, Frank Belew wrote:
> If you have reasons why it shouldn't be in potato I'd like to know

The question should be "why it should be in potato".  Oldness of the
current version is not a reason, since there are a lot of old packages
in potato, and if one is let in for that reason, the others should be
allowed too.  And we all know what happens when stable is no longer stable
(=not moving).

%%% Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho % gaia@iki.fi % http://www.iki.fi/gaia/ %%%

To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

Reply to: