Re: RFC/ITP: everybuddy-cvs
"michael d. ivey" <ivey-debian@gweezlebur.com> writes:
> I started making personal debs of the everybuddy CVS snapshots because EB
> releases tend to lag pretty far behind the code in CVS. I called my
> package ebsnap, and made it conflict with everybuddy. I put it on my
> site, and that was that.
>
> Now, I've adopted everybuddy and gotten through the NM process. I'd like
> to add the CVS version to unstable...but I don't know what to call it.
> My current idea is everybuddy-cvs, and make it conflict with everybuddy,
> and conflict/replace ebsnap, for the people who may have downloaded
> ebsnap. Is that the correct way to proceed?
I would keep the same name for both the released and CVS
versions, but upload the released version to unstable and the CVS
version to project/experimental.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: