On Fri, Jul 21, 2000 at 09:52:40AM +0900, Tomohiro KUBOTA wrote: > Then what is adequate? Sensible-x-terminal-emulator is. Has someone prototyped this yet? I'm sure I've noticed various attempts at sensible-xterm scripts being posted about, but has someone made a .deb of it yet? You should be able to make a sensible-xterm.deb that includes /usr/bin/sensible-xterm-emulator, depends, recommends or suggests kterm or hanterm or whatever's appropriate, and does: dpkg-divert --package sensible-xterm --remove --rename \ --divert /usr/bin/X11/xterm.x11 /usr/bin/X11/xterm ln -s /usr/bin/sensible-xterm-emulator /usr/bin/X11/xterm in its postinst, and something analogous in its prerm. People can then install sensible-xterm.deb and see if it works for everyone, without having to try to convince Branden, or -policy or anyone. As soon as its known to work, and xterm itself has turned out not to have improved enough, it can be recommended or depended on by xfree86-common or so. Cheers, aj -- Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/> I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred. ``We reject: kings, presidents, and voting. We believe in: rough consensus and working code.'' -- Dave Clark
Attachment:
pgpiSPy8CRm38.pgp
Description: PGP signature