[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: IPv6 adoption

On Sat, Jul 15, 2000 at 09:30:52AM -0600, Sean Reifschneider <jafo@tummy.com> wrote...
> How does going with another larger finite amount of addresses resolve
> that?  "We're running low on 32-bit addresses, so let's make the new one
> 64, or wait...  128 bits.  128 bits is enough for everybody."  Why not
> go with dynamic-sized addresses, if you really want to be future-proof?

For a good example of future-proofing, see RFC2550 :-)


	Oliver M. Bolzer

GPG (PGP) Fingerprint = 621B 52F6 2AC1 36DB 8761  018F 8786 87AD EF50 D1FF

Reply to: