Re: IPv6 adoption
On Sat, Jul 15, 2000 at 09:30:52AM -0600, Sean Reifschneider <email@example.com> wrote...
> How does going with another larger finite amount of addresses resolve
> that? "We're running low on 32-bit addresses, so let's make the new one
> 64, or wait... 128 bits. 128 bits is enough for everybody." Why not
> go with dynamic-sized addresses, if you really want to be future-proof?
For a good example of future-proofing, see RFC2550 :-)
Oliver M. Bolzer
GPG (PGP) Fingerprint = 621B 52F6 2AC1 36DB 8761 018F 8786 87AD EF50 D1FF