Re: IPv6 adoption
On Tue, Jul 11, 2000 at 11:39:17PM -0600, Dwayne C . Litzenberger wrote:
>Why are the IPv6 adoption predictions so grim? I've heard 10-20 years for
They decided that the actual utilization of IPv4 address-space wasn't
nearly as bad as they had been saying, if they could make a little better
use of it. Plus, it's a chicken-and-egg thing -- nobody uses it because
nobody uses it.
>What can we do to get the IPv6 ball rolling?
Convert everyone you know to using the 6Bone...
Remember, IPV6 addresses are 128 bits because a number of members of
the IPv6 working group didn't understand that 64 bits was significantly
more than twice the number of addresses than 32 bits.
Windows NT: From the people who brought you 640K and EDLIN
Sean Reifschneider, Inimitably Superfluous <email@example.com>
tummy.com - Linux Consulting since 1995. Qmail, KRUD, Firewalls, Python
- IPv6 adoption
- From: "Dwayne C . Litzenberger" <firstname.lastname@example.org>