Re: [LOSURS: discuss] Re: IPv6 adoption

To: Sean Reifschneider <jafo@tummy.com>
Cc: Florian Lohoff <flo@rfc822.org>, Sean Reifschneider <jafo-reginalug@tummy.com>, "Dwayne C . Litzenberger" <dlitz@cheerful.com>, LOSURS Discussion List <discuss@losurs.regina.sk.ca>, Debian Developers' Mailing List <debian-devel@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: [LOSURS: discuss] Re: IPv6 adoption
From: Tom Goulet <tomg@nova.yi.org>
Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2000 16:06:04 +0000
Message-id: <[🔎] 20000715160604.B224@nova.yi.org>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20000715093052.C29155@tummy.com>; from jafo@tummy.com on Sat, Jul 15, 2000 at 09:30:52AM -0600
References: <[🔎] 20000711233917.A11623@dlitz.dhs.org> <[🔎] 20000711234453.B29155@tummy.com> <[🔎] 20000715165541.F2391@paradigm.rfc822.org> <[🔎] 20000715093052.C29155@tummy.com>

>How does going with another larger finite amount of addresses resolve
>that?  "We're running low on 32-bit addresses, so let's make the new one
>64, or wait...  128 bits.  128 bits is enough for everybody."  Why not
>go with dynamic-sized addresses, if you really want to be future-proof?

you!could!go!from!isp!to!isp!like!this

TomG

Attachment: pgpPBEO8qxbaF.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to:

References:
- IPv6 adoption
  - From: "Dwayne C . Litzenberger" <dlitz@cheerful.com>
- Re: IPv6 adoption
  - From: Sean Reifschneider <jafo-reginalug@tummy.com>
- Re: IPv6 adoption
  - From: Florian Lohoff <flo@rfc822.org>
- Re: IPv6 adoption
  - From: Sean Reifschneider <jafo@tummy.com>

Prev by Date: Re: IPv6 adoption
Next by Date: Re: IPv6 adoption
Previous by thread: Re: IPv6 adoption
Next by thread: Re: IPv6 adoption
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread