[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [LOSURS: discuss] Re: IPv6 adoption



>How does going with another larger finite amount of addresses resolve
>that?  "We're running low on 32-bit addresses, so let's make the new one
>64, or wait...  128 bits.  128 bits is enough for everybody."  Why not
>go with dynamic-sized addresses, if you really want to be future-proof?

you!could!go!from!isp!to!isp!like!this

TomG

Attachment: pgpW_RazXJOd2.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: