Re: IPv6 adoption
On Sat, Jul 15, 2000 at 09:30:52AM -0600, Sean Reifschneider wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 15, 2000 at 04:55:41PM +0200, Florian Lohoff wrote:
> >I mean - 64k is enough for everybody and there is need for 5-6 Computers
> >in the World ...
> How does going with another larger finite amount of addresses resolve
> that? "We're running low on 32-bit addresses, so let's make the new one
> 64, or wait... 128 bits. 128 bits is enough for everybody." Why not
> go with dynamic-sized addresses, if you really want to be future-proof?
Dynamic size addresses at 622MBit/s :) They even hardly can cope
with dynamic packet sizes
Florian Lohoff email@example.com +49-5201-669912
"If you're not having fun right now, you're wasting your time."