[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: The fate of libc5

On Tue, Jul 11, 2000 at 09:12:18PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
> IMO, the better solution would be to merge ld-linux.so.1 from ldso into
> libc5 source tarball, and build them together to provide a libc5 runtime
> only .deb (IOW, no -dev package, and leave glibc to providing ldd and
> ldconfig like it needs to).

Would it still be possible to build our libc5-based old libraries
on a woody system (ie. can we still support the full libc5 runtime
environment)?  Most programs that still need libc5 need more than just
the libc.

%%% Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho % gaia@iki.fi % http://www.iki.fi/gaia/ %%%

Reply to: