Re: Why the GR is not necessary
On Jun 09, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> Chip Salzenberg <email@example.com> writes:
> > According to Thomas Bushnell, BSG:
> > > 1) Currently many poeple (as evinced by this very flame war) think
> > > that non-free is part of Debian. How can we prevent the average
> > > new user from getting this impression?
> > Rename "main" to "debian".
> I don't think that works; as long as the default sources.list contains
> all three parts, the average user will not see the names much at all.
The "default" list, such as it is, does not include all three parts.
I installed potato on a system last week (over the network), and it
specifically asked if I wanted to include non-free in my sources.list;
furthermore, the default answer it offered to that question was "no".
(The defaults for contrib and non-US were yes.)
You can see this for yourself by running the apt-setup program (which
I think is in base-config, but it may be elsewhere).
| Chris Lawrence | Get rid of Roger Wicker this year! |
| <firstname.lastname@example.org> | http://www.lordsutch.com/ms-one/ |
| | |
| Open Directory Editor | Join the party that opposed the CDA |
| http://dmoz.org/ | http://www.lp.org/ |