Re: General Resolution: Removing non-free
On Fri, Jun 09, 2000 at 01:53:43AM -0500, John Goerzen wrote:
> If non-free cannot continue to exist without Debian providing a crutch
> for it, that says a lot. A LOT. It means that there is not enough
> demand out there for non-free to exist on its own merits, and that
> therefore we should not bother.
No, it says that an integrated part of a whole has a hard time existing
on its own and that no one suddenly came up with a lot of infastructure
and help. And possibly those who cared left for Stormix or Corel or some
other distribution.
--
David Starner - dstarner98@aasaa.ofe.org
http/ftp: x8b4e53cd.dhcp.okstate.edu
"A dynamic character with an ability to survive certain death and
a questionable death scene leaving no corpse? Face it, we'll never
see her again." - Sluggy Freelance
Reply to: