Re: General Resolution: Removing non-free
Craig Sanders <cas@taz.net.au> writes:
> On Fri, Jun 09, 2000 at 01:32:20AM -0500, John Goerzen wrote:
> > > yes, go ahead and chop out the line "there is a difference" which
> > > makes the point. i'll repeat it because you seem to want to ignore
> > > it: there is a difference between ignoring something (passive
> > > discrimination at worst), and active discrimination.
> >
> > Because it's not relevant. You still have to choose what to ignore,
> > and that choice requires discrimination.
>
> you persist in deliberately using a different meaning of the word
Despite your best efforts at justifying your failed argument by
inventing new meanings for words, I'm not being fooled.
Discrimination has a very clear meaning in logic, one that is easily
defined and not easily ignored.
Reply to: