Re: General Resolution: Removing non-free
Drake Diedrich <Drake.Diedrich@anu.edu.au> writes:
> *Something* was labelled moral as opposed to immoral.
> Goerzen is himself a maintainer of non-free Debian packages.
Indeed I am.
> Goerzen either:
> 1) doesn't see the inconsistency of this (the stupid option)
> 2) isn't bothered by the inconsistency (the zealot option)
> 3) has a hidden reason for taking this position (the conspiracy option)
There exists no inconsistency. Plenty of people maintain non-free
packages. Mine should disappear along with all the rest.
> > 2. I have long held this "no compromise" attitude with respect to
> > non-free software. This has not changed. I have written with this
idled was packaged before the DFSG existed, by someone other than
myself, and as I recall, was subsequently moved from main to
> Package: idled
> Priority: extra
> Section: non-free/admin
> You ethics and intelligence then are in doubt.
Enough. This is silly character assassination that has nothing to do
with the GR. There are meny things I could point out about you in a
similar vein, but this is stupid. Let's discuss the issues and not