>>>>> "Sudhakar" == Sudhakar Chandra <thaths@netscape.com> writes: [...] Sudhakar> What if there is a set of programs that become vital but Sudhakar> are non-free in the future? I'd consider something like Sudhakar> rvplayer important for any Linux desktop. I do not. Simple fact of life: what is `vital' is *very* subjective (of all the non-free packages people have listed as "We cannot do without", I only consider Netscape Nav/Comm to be important... and that will be a thing of the past as soon as Mozilla is up to SSL and a bit more stable (though to me it seems as if it's already as stable as Netscape anyway ;-) Oh, and while you're painting horror scenarios: what if this set of `vital' programs is, say, something we cannot put into non-free anyway? You're whole argument breaks down here, IMNSHO. >> 5. The existance of the non-free section is being used as a cop-out by >> those that seek to peddle non-free wares. Sudhakar> I thought the goal of Debian was to produce the best Sudhakar> operating system possible. ^^^^^^^^ Yes, you're right, that's (one of the) goal(s) of Debian. But that "possible" of course means "possible withing the constraints we've set us". *All* we're doing here is reevaluing and resetting these constraints. Sudhakar> I did not know a Jihad against non-free software was the Sudhakar> goal. I always interpreted the Social Contract to have Sudhakar> a tone that was 'Live and Let Live' and not 'Live Free Sudhakar> or Die'. Sorry, but this is bullshit, as has been shown time and again in this thread. This GR is not about killing non-free software. Bye, J PS: Why do I even let myself get sucked into this... :-/ -- Jürgen A. Erhard eMail: jae@ilk.de phone: (GERMANY) 0721 27326 MARS: http://members.tripod.com/Juergen_Erhard/mars_index.html "First there was nothing, and God created the light. Now there was light, and there was still nothing, but you could see it." -- Guy Sie
Attachment:
pgpxMecChylsg.pgp
Description: PGP signature