On Wed, May 31, 2000 at 01:40:47PM +0000, Ben Armstrong wrote: > > In ther interim anyone can read the bts and see that GFoo has been requested, I > > can move it from wishlist to normal when I agree to package it. The BTS can be > > queried for info after the bug was closed (hmm, version 0.1.alpha of GFoo was > > the first upload). > > So there is no need to create a "wishlist package" in the BTS? That's > what I thought Jordi was implying when he said : Well, I just asked what would happen in the case you pasted below. > On Tue, 30 May 2000, Jordi Mallach wrote: > > If I ITP foobar and after 300 days I haven't uploaded anything, I guess you > > would mail bug #foobar-wishlist to comment that. How would I know you did? > > CC's or something? Is there an automatic way to do this in the BTS? > > Doesn't this imply the existence of a "foobar-wishlist" package in the > BTS? I meant mailing to the bug number, as Jules already said. > I guess the problem that I thought remained unsolved isn't a problem. I > thought the BTS wouldn't notify the developer who announced his ITP. But > of course, if his email is attached to the wishlist in the BTS, he'll > automatically be copied on any additional info added to the wishlist bug, > won't he? I thought submitters don't receive additional bug info if you only mail the bug. I guess that's why the bts sets a reply to "submitter, bug" when you receive one. There's also bugnumber-submitter@bugs.debian.org available, IIRC. -- Jordi Mallach Pérez || jordi@pusa.informat.uv.es || Rediscovering Freedom, ka Oskuro in RL-MUD || jordi@sindominio.net || Using Debian GNU/Linux http://sindominio.net GnuPG public information: pub 1024D/917A225E telnet pusa.uv.es 23 73ED 4244 FD43 5886 20AC 2644 2584 94BA 917A 225E
Attachment:
pgpunp4I7jbqA.pgp
Description: PGP signature