Re: Packages removed from frozen [xemacs20]
bam@debian.org (Brian May) writes:
> >>>>> "Richard" == Richard Braakman <dark@xs4all.nl> writes:
[ removal of xemacs20 from frozen ]
> I have to say I find this rather surprising...
>
I'd rather consider this a natural move since xemacs21 supersedes and
enhances it considerably since quite some time now.
> Not that I am complaining, just surprised that a major package like
> xemacs20 won't be in potato. I guess that means we should upgrade to
> xemacs21.
>
You won't regret it IMHO. At least i didn't. ;-)
Cheers, P. *8^)
--
------------ Paul Seelig <pseelig@mail.uni-mainz.de> -------------
African Music Archive - Institute for Ethnology and Africa Studies
Johannes Gutenberg-University - Forum 6 - 55099 Mainz/Germany
------------------- http://ntama.uni-mainz.de --------------------
Reply to: