[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: apt sources.list

On Tue, Apr 25, 2000 at 08:57:26AM -0400, Michael Stone wrote:
> > People who want to stick with slink even after potato is released shouldn't
> > run apt-get upgrade, IMHO. Presuming we do our job properly and enable a
> > smooth upgrade, that shouldn't be a problem.
> I disagree. People may want to periodically run apt-get upgrade to keep
> up-to-date on critical/security bug fixes but might not want to do a
> major system upgrade without some preparation. Obviously that's not true
> in all cases, but I think "shouldn't" is too strong here.

You're forgetting that Debian doesn't support obsoleted stable releases.
(note that I don't have a strong opinion on that, just stating the fact)

One must change his sources.list to archive.debian.org or something to get
anything from hamm nowadays, anyway.

Digital Electronic Being Intended for Assassination and Nullification

Reply to: