[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: apt sources.list



On Tue, Apr 25, 2000 at 08:57:26AM -0400, Michael Stone wrote:
> > People who want to stick with slink even after potato is released shouldn't
> > run apt-get upgrade, IMHO. Presuming we do our job properly and enable a
> > smooth upgrade, that shouldn't be a problem.
> 
> I disagree. People may want to periodically run apt-get upgrade to keep
> up-to-date on critical/security bug fixes but might not want to do a
> major system upgrade without some preparation. Obviously that's not true
> in all cases, but I think "shouldn't" is too strong here.

You're forgetting that Debian doesn't support obsoleted stable releases.
(note that I don't have a strong opinion on that, just stating the fact)

One must change his sources.list to archive.debian.org or something to get
anything from hamm nowadays, anyway.

-- 
Digital Electronic Being Intended for Assassination and Nullification


Reply to: