[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: New shmfs and Debian



On Mon, Apr 03, 2000 at 10:03:49PM +0200, Grendel wrote:
> ** On Apr 03, Ben Collins scribbled:
> 
> > > number would be higher or equal to 3 it would drop the line into /etc/fstab.
> > > But that solution is unclean. Adding /var/shm to base-files is trivial as it
> > > won't hurt anyone, but the rest isn't quite that trivial. Nevertheless, the
> > > entry in /etc/fstab must get there one way or another... The problem is that
> > > the user may decide to switch to 2.3.x or 2.4.x at any point and at that
> > > point he must have the entry or something _will_ fail...
> > > 
> > 
> > I don't know why you insist it must be added to fstab. If a script can
> Because it's clean that way and that's where it belongs, just like devfs for
> example...
> 

No, devfs is automatically mounted by the kernel before init is even
started. That is a different case altogether.

-- 
 -----------=======-=-======-=========-----------=====------------=-=------
/  Ben Collins  --  ...on that fantastic voyage...  --  Debian GNU/Linux   \
`     bcollins@debian.org  --  bcollins@openldap.org  --  bmc@visi.net     '
 `---=========------=======-------------=-=-----=-===-======-------=--=---'


Reply to: