Re: "GNU/Linux" vs. "Linux"

To: Martin Schulze <joey@infodrom.north.de>
Cc: Debian Development <debian-devel@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: "GNU/Linux" vs. "Linux"
From: "Matus \"fantomas\" Uhlar" <uhlar@fantomas.sk>
Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2000 11:02:02 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 20000331110202.A9220@fantomas.sk>
Mail-followup-to: Martin Schulze <joey@infodrom.north.de>, Debian Development <debian-devel@lists.debian.org>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20000330095607.D16108@finlandia.infodrom.north.de>; from Martin Schulze on Thu, Mar 30, 2000 at 09:56:07AM +0200
References: <[🔎] 20000330095607.D16108@finlandia.infodrom.north.de>

-> Ok folks, why is Debian called "GNU/Linux" instead of simply "Linux"?

Because Debian is a lot of GNU packages with linux (and possibly hurd,
freebsd, solaris) kernel.
-- 
 Matus "fantomas" Uhlar, sysadmin at NEXTRA, Slovakia; IRCNET admin of *.sk
 uhlar@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ ; http://www.nextra.sk/
 2B|!2B, that's a question!

Reply to:

References:
- "GNU/Linux" vs. "Linux"
  - From: Martin Schulze <joey@finlandia.Infodrom.North.DE>

Prev by Date: Re: ATTN: pjw@edmc.net
Next by Date: Re: Not to get off on a rant here.....
Previous by thread: Re: "GNU/Linux" vs. "Linux"
Next by thread: How to hide/show cursor without Ncurses ?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread