Re: "GNU/Linux" vs. "Linux"

To: Martin Schulze <joey@infodrom.north.de>
Cc: Debian Development <debian-devel@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: "GNU/Linux" vs. "Linux"
From: Miles Bader <miles@ccs.mt.nec.co.jp>
Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2000 12:21:12 +0900 (JST)
Message-id: <[🔎] 20000331032112.B06AF5EB2@splpe325.ccs.mt.nec.co.jp>
Reply-to: Miles Bader <miles@gnu.org>
In-reply-to: Martin Schulze's message of "Thu, 30 Mar 2000 09:56:07 +0200"
References: <[🔎] 20000330095607.D16108@finlandia.infodrom.north.de>

Martin Schulze <joey@finlandia.Infodrom.North.DE> writes:
> Ok folks, why is Debian called "GNU/Linux" instead of simply "Linux"?

To annoy all the uptight "Linux" fanboys.  Duh.

Cheers,

-Miles
-- 
Love is a snowmobile racing across the tundra.  Suddenly it flips over,
pinning you underneath.  At night the ice weasels come.  --Nietzsche

Reply to:

References:
- "GNU/Linux" vs. "Linux"
  - From: Martin Schulze <joey@finlandia.Infodrom.North.DE>

Prev by Date: Re: how about a real unstable?
Next by Date: daemontools and dnscache source debs available
Previous by thread: Re: "GNU/Linux" vs. "Linux"
Next by thread: Re: "GNU/Linux" vs. "Linux"
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread