Re: ITP: namazu2
From: kitame@northeye.org (Takuo KITAME / 北目 拓郎)
Subject: Re: ITP: namazu2
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2000 17:33:48 +0900
> I'm NOT saying that "Namazu and Namazu2 are both needed".
> When namazu2 installed in Debian and namazu2 became stable[1], it's
> time to remove namazu.
If so then you should explain so much more clearly in your
former replies. I could not guess so from your former replies.
> Why not?
Why not??? Who object to your ITP? Please calm down yourself.
I do not object to your ITP and Mr. Arafune also said
From: Ryuichi Arafune <arafune@debian.org>
Subject: Re: ITP: namazu2
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2000 13:32:20 +0900
> This is only my optinon, actually. Therefor you ,of cource, can do as
> you think if you dont infrace our policy.
But if namazu2 is so unstable it might be better to put it
in experimental, I think.
In any way, you do not need to reply so rapidly, please
think over a while.
Thanks in advance, 2000.2.18
--
Debian JP Developer - much more I18N of Debian
Atsuhito Kohda <kohda@pm.tokushima-u.ac.jp>
Department of Math., Tokushima Univ.
Reply to: