[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: ITP: namazu2

From: kitame@northeye.org (Takuo KITAME / 北目 拓郎)
Subject: Re: ITP: namazu2
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2000 17:33:48 +0900

> I'm NOT saying that "Namazu and Namazu2 are both needed".
> When namazu2 installed in Debian and namazu2 became stable[1], it's
> time to remove namazu.

If so then you should explain so much more clearly in your
former replies.  I could not guess so from your former replies.

> Why not?

Why not??? Who object to your ITP? Please calm down yourself.

I do not object to your ITP and Mr. Arafune also said

From: Ryuichi Arafune <arafune@debian.org>
Subject: Re: ITP: namazu2
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2000 13:32:20 +0900

> This is only my optinon, actually.  Therefor you ,of cource, can do as
> you think if you dont infrace our policy.

But if namazu2 is so unstable it might be better to put it
in experimental, I think.

In any way, you do not need to reply so rapidly, please
think over a while.

Thanks in advance,		2000.2.18

 Debian JP Developer - much more I18N of Debian
 Atsuhito Kohda <kohda@pm.tokushima-u.ac.jp>
 Department of Math., Tokushima Univ.

Reply to: