[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: ITP: namazu2

From: kitame@northeye.org (Takuo KITAME / 北目 拓郎)
Subject: Re: ITP: namazu2
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2000 14:07:17 +0900

> RA> developers reference.  To put it shortly, this is not a reason why anyone
> RA> build a separate package.  
> Do you know that libc5 and libc6 both are in Debian? 
> or libgtk1 and libgtk1.2, or so.

You might show us the examples but you did not show us the 

I guess that libc5 is needed because there are some (perhaps 
commercial) binaries which depend on libc5.  So there is a
enough reason that there are both libc5 and libc6.

In the same way, if there is a good reason that both namazu and
namazu2 are necessary, then it is enough for you to explain the 
reason clearly to us, that's all.

> We can not only add package but can also remove.

But, of course, we do not need any packages which exist
only for removing :)

> Off topic:
>  Your cite prefix is too long and hard to read so that I hate. 

I do not like (but not hate :) the way you replied.

The question of Mr. Arafune is a very natural one and
I think your reply is not enough as I explained.

Thanks in advance,		2000.2.18

 Debian JP Developer - much more I18N of Debian
 Atsuhito Kohda <kohda@pm.tokushima-u.ac.jp>
 Department of Math., Tokushima Univ.

Reply to: