Re: ITP: namazu2
From: email@example.com (Takuo KITAME / 北目 拓郎)
Subject: Re: ITP: namazu2
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2000 14:07:17 +0900
> RA> developers reference. To put it shortly, this is not a reason why anyone
> RA> build a separate package.
> Do you know that libc5 and libc6 both are in Debian?
> or libgtk1 and libgtk1.2, or so.
You might show us the examples but you did not show us the
I guess that libc5 is needed because there are some (perhaps
commercial) binaries which depend on libc5. So there is a
enough reason that there are both libc5 and libc6.
In the same way, if there is a good reason that both namazu and
namazu2 are necessary, then it is enough for you to explain the
reason clearly to us, that's all.
> We can not only add package but can also remove.
But, of course, we do not need any packages which exist
only for removing :)
> Off topic:
> Your cite prefix is too long and hard to read so that I hate.
I do not like (but not hate :) the way you replied.
The question of Mr. Arafune is a very natural one and
I think your reply is not enough as I explained.
Thanks in advance, 2000.2.18
Debian JP Developer - much more I18N of Debian
Atsuhito Kohda <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Department of Math., Tokushima Univ.