Re: xqf removed from potato because of 1 bug...
On 03-Feb-00, 05:43 (CST), Michael Stone <email@example.com> wrote:
> The decisions about which packages "we can live without" are not
> immediately obvious.
How is the [REMOVE] note in the RCB "not immediately obvious"?
(OTOH, I don't see how "new upstream version" qualifies as a release
critical bug, either...why didn't the maintainer downgrade it?)
Steve Greenland <firstname.lastname@example.org>
(Please do not CC me on mail sent to this list; I subscribe to and read
every list I post to.)