Re: Where is libgl?
>>>>> "Joseph" == Joseph Carter <knghtbrd@debian.org> writes:
Joseph> Yeah, well um if Mesa 3.1 doesn't get into the archive
Joseph> with Glide support, I'm uploading it myself. I've had
Joseph> working glquake for literally months, since early
Joseph> September but I couldn't package it because I couldn't
Joseph> meet its depends.
Joseph> I'm sorry but not letting Mesa 3.1 get into potato now
Joseph> REALLY steps on my toes and I will be very unhappy if my
Joseph> free quake packages get pulled for unresolvable
Joseph> dependencies.
Joseph, I'm not trying to step on your toes here! I agree that Mesa
3.1 should get into the archives -- but I'm just trying (like you) to
say that it should NOT replace Mesa 3.0.
Ben
--
Brought to you by the letters G and Q and the number 14.
"A yonker is a young man."
Debian GNU/Linux maintainer of Gimp and GTK+ -- http://www.debian.org/
Reply to: