Re: Changes to potato today
On Thu, Dec 23, 1999 at 12:03:32AM +0100, Richard Braakman wrote:
> I've kept all those packages in ~dark/oldlibs on master; the rest
> will go there too.
> There was no source for a number of the packages, but I don't know if
> those were your _only_ libstdc++ packages. I targeted the ones that
> had "source: egcs".
Yes, those are our only libstdc++ until I redo my porting work I did for
egcs for gcc (somehow it was lost in the transition, and essentially I have
to work from scratch).
The real question is: Why did the source go while there were still binary
packages based on it?
master:/debian/debian/dists/unstable/main/binary-hurd-i386/base$ less libstdc++2.9_2.91.66-1.2.deb
new debian package, version 2.0.
size 116506 bytes: control archive= 639 bytes.
438 bytes, 13 lines control
340 bytes, 5 lines md5sums
Depends: libc0.2, libc0.2 (>= 2.1)
Replaces: libstdc++2.9-ss (<< 2.91.67)
Maintainer: Debian EGCS maintainers <email@example.com>
Source: egcs (1.1.2-1.2)
`Rhubarb is no Egyptian god.' Debian http://www.debian.org Check Key server
Marcus Brinkmann GNU http://www.gnu.org for public PGP Key
Marcus.Brinkmann@ruhr-uni-bochum.de, firstname.lastname@example.org PGP Key ID 36E7CD09